Security is structural
Audit logs, scoped permissions and encryption are designed in from the first schema, not bolted on when a client asks about compliance.
Advice is cheap. Working systems aren’t.
Most consultancies stop at the recommendation. We kept going. These are three systems Mimir designed, built and runs in production — each one started as a business problem that no off-the-shelf product solved properly, and each one is available to deploy for your business.
Electronic proof of delivery. The recipient signs on their own phone through a single-use QR code — signature, photos, timestamp and location sealed into a PDF and pushed into your ERP. Works with no signal.
A trade ordering portal that knows each customer’s contract prices, checks their credit live before accepting an order, tracks catch-weight through to invoice, and reconciles itself against your ERP every night.
Professional services automation with AI triage on every ticket, an encrypted knowledge base and password vault with folder-level permissions, and versioned processes that attach to live tickets.
Different problems, one engineering standard.
Audit logs, scoped permissions and encryption are designed in from the first schema, not bolted on when a client asks about compliance.
Every system is containerised and deployable on your own infrastructure. No lock-in, no hostage data, documented backup and restore from day one.
Each product assumes you already have systems that matter. Adapters, signed webhooks and documented APIs mean nothing gets re-keyed by hand.
These are products, not templates. Branding, workflow, roles and integrations are shaped to how your business actually runs before go-live.
It is a fair question. The short answer is that all three of these started as somebody else’s problem that we were brought in to solve, and in each case the honest recommendation would have been to buy something — except that what was available either did not do the job or priced a small business out of it entirely.
The longer answer is that building keeps the advice honest. It is easy to recommend an integration when you have never had to maintain one. Having to run these in production, with real users who complain when something is slow, is a useful corrective to the kind of architecture advice that sounds good in a document and falls apart on contact with a bad mobile signal in a depot.
An important distinction, because it changes what you are buying. A project ends with a handover and a maintenance conversation nobody wanted. A product is already running, already has the awkward edge cases handled, and improves without a change request.
What that means practically: configuration rather than development for most of what a new deployment needs, a known deployment path rather than a discovery phase, and fixes that arrive because another user hit the same thing first. Where genuinely bespoke work is required we will say so, scope it separately, and price it as development rather than hiding it in a licence fee.
Most engagements are not a product at all. They are the strategic IT services that sit alongside them — and deploying any of these three properly draws on the same disciplines:
If you are not sure whether your problem needs one of these products or simply better use of what you already own, that is what the assessment is for. It is a legitimate outcome for it to conclude that you need neither.
Let’s talk about what it would take to run it in your business.
Request a Strategy Session Accepting new clients